Comparison

Limonade sans sucres vs Grapefruit Zero Sugar, 8% Fruchtgehalt

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientLimonade sans sucresGrapefruit Zero Sugar, 8% Fr...
Nutri-Score — c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 1 kcal 3 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 0 g
Sugars 0.1 g 0.5 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0 g
Protein — 0 g
Additives49
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Grapefruit Zero Sugar, 8% Fruchtgehalt has no fat, while Limonade sans sucres has 0.5 g.
  • Grapefruit Zero Sugar, 8% Fruchtgehalt has no saturated fat, while Limonade sans sucres has 0.5 g.
  • Limonade sans sucres has 81% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Limonade sans sucres has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

Limonade sans sucres

Eau gazéifiée, acidifiant: acide citrique, arôme naturel de citron (0.1%), arome naturel, conservateur: benzoate de sodium, édulcorants : sucralose et acésulfame-K.

Grapefruit Zero Sugar, 8% Fruchtgehalt

Wasser, Kohlensäure, Grapefruitsaftkonzentrat, Zitronensaftkonzentrat, Orangensaftkonzentrat, Mandarinensaftkonzentrat, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure; Süßungsmittel (Cyclamat, Acesulfam K, Saccharin, Aspartam), Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure; natürliches Aroma, Stabilisatoren (Pektine, Guarkernmehl), Vitaminmischung (Vitamin E, Niacin, Pantothenat, Vitamin B6, Folsäure), konzentrierter Zitronenextrakt.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Limonade sans sucres or Grapefruit Zero Sugar, 8% Fruchtgehalt?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Limonade sans sucres has fewer calories: 1 kcal versus 3 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Limonade sans sucres has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons