Light Brown Soft Natural Unrefined Cane Sugar vs Esotico zucchero di canna
Overall, Esotico zucchero di canna has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Light Brown Soft Natural Unrefined Cane Sugar
Esotico zucchero di canna
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Light Brown Soft Natural Unr... | Esotico zucchero di canna |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 397 kcal | 400 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 99 g | 100 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Esotico zucchero di canna has no salt, while Light Brown Soft Natural Unrefined Cane Sugar has 0.4 g.
Ingredients
Light Brown Soft Natural Unrefined Cane Sugar
Cane sugar.
Esotico zucchero di canna
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Light Brown Soft Natural Unrefined Cane Sugar or Esotico zucchero di canna?
Overall, Esotico zucchero di canna has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Light Brown Soft Natural Unrefined Cane Sugar has fewer calories: 397 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Light Brown Soft Natural Unrefined Cane Sugar has less sugar: 99 g versus 100 g per 100 g.