Les tranches fondantes 50% de foie gras vs Tartinable au foie de canard
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Les tranches fondantes 50% de foie gras
Tartinable au foie de canard
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Les tranches fondantes 50% d... | Tartinable au foie de canard |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 394 kcal | 379 kcal |
| Fat | 39 g | 38 g |
| Saturated fat | 16 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 1.6 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 9.6 g | 7.8 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Milk | Eggs, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tartinable au foie de canard has 25% less saturated fat (12 g vs 16 g).
- Les tranches fondantes 50% de foie gras has 19% less salt (1.3 g vs 1.6 g).
- Tartinable au foie de canard has 100% more fiber (0.9 g vs 0 g).
- Les tranches fondantes 50% de foie gras has 19% more protein (9.6 g vs 7.8 g).
Ingredients
Les tranches fondantes 50% de foie gras
Foie gras de canard 50%, foie de poulet 23,8%, gras de porc, _oeufs_ entiers pasteurises, eau, _lait_, sel, poivre, sucre, antioxydant: e301, conservateur: e250.
Tartinable au foie de canard
Foie gras de canard (20%) (origine UE), foie de volaille, graisse de canard, ŒUF (origine France), LAIT, eau, sel, Sauternes (0,5%), poivre, antioxydant : acide ascorbique, sucre, conservateur : nitrite de sodium.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Les tranches fondantes 50% de foie gras or Tartinable au foie de canard?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tartinable au foie de canard has fewer calories: 379 kcal versus 394 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tartinable au foie de canard has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.