Comparison

Lentilles vertes vs Tomatoey French Lentils

Overall, Lentilles vertes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLentilles vertesTomatoey French Lentils
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 328 kcal 142 kcal
Fat 1.8 g 4.1 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.7 g
Sugars 1.1 g 3.3 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 16 g 3.3 g
Protein 25 g 8.3 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedSulphur dioxide and sulphites

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tomatoey French Lentils has 57% fewer calories (142 kcal vs 328 kcal).
  • Lentilles vertes has 56% less fat (1.8 g vs 4.1 g).
  • Lentilles vertes has 71% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Lentilles vertes has 67% less sugar (1.1 g vs 3.3 g).
  • Lentilles vertes has 79% more fiber (16 g vs 3.3 g).
  • Lentilles vertes has 67% more protein (25 g vs 8.3 g).
  • Lentilles vertes is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Tomatoey French Lentils lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Lentilles vertes

lentilles vertes

Tomatoey French Lentils

Cooked Green Lentils (70%) (Water, Green Lentils), Tomato and Basil Sauce (10%) (Tomato Purée, Basil, contains Sunflower Oil and/or Rapeseed Oil, Water, Sugar, Salt, Tapioca Starch, Potato Starch). Cooked Puy Lentils (10%) (Water, Puy Lentils), Onion, Olive Oil, Basil (1.5%), Dried Tomato (1.4%), White Wine (Sulphites), Natural Flavour, Garlic, Sugar, Black Pepper, Salt.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Lentilles vertes or Tomatoey French Lentils?

Overall, Lentilles vertes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tomatoey French Lentils has fewer calories: 142 kcal versus 328 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Lentilles vertes has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 3.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons