Leibniz Zoo Kiks m. kakao vs Lipton Earl grey
Overall, Lipton Earl grey has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Leibniz Zoo Kiks m. kakao | Lipton Earl grey |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 426 kcal | 4 kcal |
| Fat | 11 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 27 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 7.1 g | — |
| Protein | 7.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lipton Earl grey has 99% fewer calories (4 kcal vs 426 kcal).
- Lipton Earl grey has 95% less fat (0.5 g vs 11 g).
- Lipton Earl grey has 92% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.3 g).
- Lipton Earl grey has 98% less sugar (0.5 g vs 27 g).
- Lipton Earl grey has 98% less salt (0 g vs 0.6 g).
- Leibniz Zoo Kiks m. kakao has 93% more protein (7.3 g vs 0.5 g).
- Lipton Earl grey has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Leibniz Zoo Kiks m. kakao lists: Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Leibniz Zoo Kiks m. kakao
HVEDEMEL (64 %), sukker,solsikke, fedtfattigt kakaopulver (3,9 %),oligofruktose, hævemiddel:natriumkarbonater,ammoniumcarbonater, salt, emulgator:lecithiner, (MÆLK). Kan indeholde: ÆG.
Lipton Earl grey
Sort te, aroma.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Leibniz Zoo Kiks m. kakao or Lipton Earl grey?
Overall, Lipton Earl grey has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lipton Earl grey has fewer calories: 4 kcal versus 426 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lipton Earl grey has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 27 g per 100 g.