Comparison

Le palet végétal saveur chèvre vs Greek White panetto

Overall, Le palet végétal saveur chèvre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLe palet végétal saveur chèv...Greek White panetto
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 264 kcal 307 kcal
Fat 20.5 g 29 g
Saturated fat 18.5 g 26 g
Sugars 3.5 g 0 g
Salt 1.2 g 1.7 g
Protein 1.5 g 0 g
Additives41
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Le palet végétal saveur chèvre has 14% fewer calories (264 kcal vs 307 kcal).
  • Le palet végétal saveur chèvre has 29% less fat (20.5 g vs 29 g).
  • Le palet végétal saveur chèvre has 29% less saturated fat (18.5 g vs 26 g).
  • Greek White panetto has no sugar, while Le palet végétal saveur chèvre has 3.5 g.
  • Le palet végétal saveur chèvre has 29% less salt (1.2 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Le palet végétal saveur chèvre has 100% more protein (1.5 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

Le palet végétal saveur chèvre

Eau, huile de noix de coco 19%, amidons modifiés, arômes naturels, protéine de tournesol, sel, sucre, correcteur d'acidité (lactate de calcium), acidifiant (acide lactique), colorant (caroténoïdes), ferments. Peut contenir des traces de lait.

Greek White panetto

WATER, COCONUT OIL (29%), STARCH, SEA SALT, ACIDITY REGULATOR: GLUCONO DELTA LACTONE, FLAVOURINGS, OLIVE EXTRACT, VITAMIN B12.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Le palet végétal saveur chèvre or Greek White panetto?

Overall, Le palet végétal saveur chèvre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Le palet végétal saveur chèvre has fewer calories: 264 kcal versus 307 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Greek White panetto has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons