Comparison

Le fleurier 250g doux vs ST HUBERT OMEGA doux 510 g Offre Découverte

Overall, ST HUBERT OMEGA doux 510 g Offre Découverte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLe fleurier 250g douxST HUBERT OMEGA doux 510 g O...
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 479 kcal 468 kcal
Fat 53 g 52 g
Saturated fat 25 g 15 g
Sugars 0.6 g 0 g
Salt 0.5 g 0.4 g
Protein 0 g 0 g
Additives74
AllergensMilk, SoybeansSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • ST HUBERT OMEGA doux 510 g Offre Découverte has 40% less saturated fat (15 g vs 25 g).
  • ST HUBERT OMEGA doux 510 g Offre Découverte has no sugar, while Le fleurier 250g doux has 0.6 g.
  • Only Le fleurier 250g doux lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Le fleurier 250g doux

Huiles et stéarine végétales 40% (colza, coco, palme), eau, BEURRE (15,5%), LAIT écrémé réhydraté, émulsifiants (mono et diglycérides d'acide gras, lécithine de SOJA), sel, arôme, conservateur (sorbate de potassium), correcteur d'acidité (acide lactique), colorant (bêta-carotène).

ST HUBERT OMEGA doux 510 g Offre Découverte

Huiles et stéarines végétales 51% (colza 30%, palmiste, lin 5,4%, palme), eau, émulsifiant (lécithine de SOJA), sel, arômes, colorant (bêta-carotène), vitamine B1. Nom de l'additif : Lécitine de SOJA, bêta-carotène

FAQ

Which is healthier: Le fleurier 250g doux or ST HUBERT OMEGA doux 510 g Offre Découverte?

Overall, ST HUBERT OMEGA doux 510 g Offre Découverte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

ST HUBERT OMEGA doux 510 g Offre Découverte has fewer calories: 468 kcal versus 479 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

ST HUBERT OMEGA doux 510 g Offre Découverte has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons