Le Cœur Fleuri Végétal vs Veganer Hirtengenuss
Overall, Le Cœur Fleuri Végétal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Le Cœur Fleuri Végétal | Veganer Hirtengenuss |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 270 kcal | 304 kcal |
| Fat | 22 g | 29.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 19 g | 26.6 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 2.4 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 0.4 g |
| Additives | 3 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Le Cœur Fleuri Végétal has 11% fewer calories (270 kcal vs 304 kcal).
- Le Cœur Fleuri Végétal has 24% less fat (22 g vs 29.1 g).
- Le Cœur Fleuri Végétal has 29% less saturated fat (19 g vs 26.6 g).
- Veganer Hirtengenuss has 97% less sugar (0.1 g vs 3 g).
- Le Cœur Fleuri Végétal has 33% less salt (1.6 g vs 2.4 g).
- Le Cœur Fleuri Végétal has 60% more protein (1 g vs 0.4 g).
Ingredients
Le Cœur Fleuri Végétal
Eau, huile de noix de coco 20%, amidon modifié, protéines de tournesol, sel, arômes naturels, correcteur d'acidité : acide lactique, sucre, colorant (caroténoïdes), cultures. Peut contenir des traces de lait.
Veganer Hirtengenuss
water, 29% coconut oil, starch (corn, potato), table salt, modified starch, acidity regulator: glucono delta lactone, potato protein, thickener: agar-agar, natural flavor, olive extract,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Le Cœur Fleuri Végétal or Veganer Hirtengenuss?
Overall, Le Cœur Fleuri Végétal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Le Cœur Fleuri Végétal has fewer calories: 270 kcal versus 304 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Veganer Hirtengenuss has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 3 g per 100 g.