Comparison

Le caractère de bœuf x2 vs Hamburger di tacchino al rosmarino

Overall, Le caractère de bœuf x2 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 9 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLe caractère de bœuf x2Hamburger di tacchino al ros...
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 116 kcal 143 kcal
Fat 3.5 g 7.5 g
Saturated fat 1.3 g 2.3 g
Sugars 0 g 0.6 g
Salt 0.1 g 1 g
Fiber 0 g 0.6 g
Protein 21 g 16 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Le caractère de bœuf x2 has 19% fewer calories (116 kcal vs 143 kcal).
  • Le caractère de bœuf x2 has 53% less fat (3.5 g vs 7.5 g).
  • Le caractère de bœuf x2 has 43% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Le caractère de bœuf x2 has no sugar, while Hamburger di tacchino al rosmarino has 0.6 g.
  • Le caractère de bœuf x2 has 88% less salt (0.1 g vs 1 g).
  • Hamburger di tacchino al rosmarino has 100% more fiber (0.6 g vs 0 g).
  • Le caractère de bœuf x2 has 24% more protein (21 g vs 16 g).
  • Le caractère de bœuf x2 has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Le caractère de bœuf x2 is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Le caractère de bœuf x2

Viande de bœuf

Hamburger di tacchino al rosmarino

carne di tacchino 85%, acqua, patate, granuli di patata, sale, concentrato di barbabietola, rosmarino fresco, antiossidanti: acido ascorbico, aromi,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Le caractère de bœuf x2 or Hamburger di tacchino al rosmarino?

Overall, Le caractère de bœuf x2 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Le caractère de bœuf x2 has fewer calories: 116 kcal versus 143 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Le caractère de bœuf x2 has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons