Comparison

Latte Noisette vs Eiscaffee Jacobs ice coffee

Overall, Latte Noisette has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLatte NoisetteEiscaffee Jacobs ice coffee
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 418 kcal 404 kcal
Fat 11.8 g 8.2 g
Saturated fat 0 g 8.1 g
Sugars 50 g 57 g
Salt 0 g 0.7 g
Fiber 2.4 g 2.3 g
Protein 8.8 g 7.7 g
Additives34
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Eiscaffee Jacobs ice coffee has 30% less fat (8.2 g vs 11.8 g).
  • Latte Noisette has no saturated fat, while Eiscaffee Jacobs ice coffee has 8.1 g.
  • Latte Noisette has 12% less sugar (50 g vs 57 g).
  • Latte Noisette has no salt, while Eiscaffee Jacobs ice coffee has 0.7 g.
  • Latte Noisette has 13% more protein (8.8 g vs 7.7 g).
  • Only Latte Noisette lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Latte Noisette

Sucre, lait écrémé en poudre (23%), sirop de glucose, huile de coco, café (7%) [café instantané (6%), café torréfié et moulu], lactose (issu du lait), correcteur d'acidité (bicarbonate de sodium, acide citrique), arôme naturel, sel,

Eiscaffee Jacobs ice coffee

Zucker (44%), Magermilchpulver (20%), Glukosesirup, Palmkernöl, löslicher Bohnenkaffee (7,4%), Milcheiweiß, Säureregulator (E340), Aroma, Verdickungsmittel (E415), Emulgator (E481), Trennmittel (E551). Trocken lagern und vor Wärme schützen. LUM3021923 10112023

FAQ

Which is healthier: Latte Noisette or Eiscaffee Jacobs ice coffee?

Overall, Latte Noisette has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Eiscaffee Jacobs ice coffee has fewer calories: 404 kcal versus 418 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Latte Noisette has less sugar: 50 g versus 57 g per 100 g.

More comparisons