Late Bottled Vintage Port 2009 vs Porto Cálem Velhotes Tawny Port Wine
Overall, Late Bottled Vintage Port 2009 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Late Bottled Vintage Port 2009
Porto Cálem Velhotes Tawny Port Wine
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Late Bottled Vintage Port 20... | Porto Cálem Velhotes Tawny P... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 132 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 10.3 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Late Bottled Vintage Port 2009 has no calories, while Porto Cálem Velhotes Tawny Port Wine has 132 kcal.
- Late Bottled Vintage Port 2009 has no fat, while Porto Cálem Velhotes Tawny Port Wine has 10.3 g.
- Late Bottled Vintage Port 2009 has no sugar, while Porto Cálem Velhotes Tawny Port Wine has 1 g.
Ingredients
Late Bottled Vintage Port 2009
Port
Porto Cálem Velhotes Tawny Port Wine
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Late Bottled Vintage Port 2009 or Porto Cálem Velhotes Tawny Port Wine?
Overall, Late Bottled Vintage Port 2009 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Late Bottled Vintage Port 2009 has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 132 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Late Bottled Vintage Port 2009 has less sugar: 0 g versus 1 g per 100 g.