Lasagnes du pêcheur farce sétoise vs Lasagnes au thon
Overall, Lasagnes du pêcheur farce sétoise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lasagnes du pêcheur farce sé... | Lasagnes au thon |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 142 kcal | 157 kcal |
| Fat | 7.1 g | 6.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.5 g | 4.2 g |
| Sugars | 2.8 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 7.4 g | 2.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Molluscs | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lasagnes du pêcheur farce sétoise has 17% less saturated fat (3.5 g vs 4.2 g).
- Lasagnes du pêcheur farce sétoise has 20% less sugar (2.8 g vs 3.5 g).
- Lasagnes du pêcheur farce sétoise has 72% more protein (7.4 g vs 2.1 g).
- Only Lasagnes du pêcheur farce sétoise lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Molluscs.
Ingredients
Lasagnes du pêcheur farce sétoise
Lait écrémé, céphalopodes (encornets géants, poulpes, sel) 18,3%, eau, carottes, pâtes fraîches 8,2% (semoule de blé dur, oeuf frais, eau), tomates concassées 8%, oignons, farine de blé, double concentré de tomate 3%, emmental, huile de tournesol, huile d'olive, beurre 1,3%, sel, ail, poivre, thym, muscade, piment. Produit dans un atelier utilisant : crustacés, poisson, céleri, soja, moutarde.
Lasagnes au thon
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lasagnes du pêcheur farce sétoise or Lasagnes au thon?
Overall, Lasagnes du pêcheur farce sétoise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lasagnes du pêcheur farce sétoise has fewer calories: 142 kcal versus 157 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lasagnes du pêcheur farce sétoise has less sugar: 2.8 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.