Lardons volaille fumes 2x75g vs Dés de poulet
Overall, Dés de poulet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lardons volaille fumes 2x75g | Dés de poulet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 150 kcal | 95 kcal |
| Fat | 9.1 g | 4 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.6 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 2.2 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 5 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dés de poulet has 37% fewer calories (95 kcal vs 150 kcal).
- Dés de poulet has 56% less fat (4 g vs 9.1 g).
- Dés de poulet has 62% less saturated fat (1 g vs 2.6 g).
- Dés de poulet has 50% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1.2 g).
- Dés de poulet has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Lardons volaille fumes 2x75g has 13% more protein (16 g vs 14 g).
- Dés de poulet has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Lardons volaille fumes 2x75g
Viande de poulet (cuisse de poulet*, peau de poulet*) 95%, antioxydants : lactate de potassium, ascorbate de sodium ; ; sel, dextrose, conservateurs : acétate de sodium, nitrite de sodium.*Origine : France
Dés de poulet
Viande de poulet (Suisse) 76%, eau, fécule de pomme de terre 2%, sel nitrité pour saumure (sel de cuisine, conservateur: nitrite de sodium), condiment, épices, glucose, extrait de levure, antioxydant: ascorbate de sodium, stabilisant: diphosphates.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lardons volaille fumes 2x75g or Dés de poulet?
Overall, Dés de poulet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Dés de poulet has fewer calories: 95 kcal versus 150 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Dés de poulet has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.