La Terrine de lièvre à la sarriette et aux noisettes vs Terrine de Lièvre parfumée au romarin
Overall, Terrine de Lièvre parfumée au romarin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
La Terrine de lièvre à la sarriette et aux noisettes
Terrine de Lièvre parfumée au romarin
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | La Terrine de lièvre à la sa... | Terrine de Lièvre parfumée a... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 291 kcal | 179 kcal |
| Fat | 23 g | 10.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.1 g | 4 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Terrine de Lièvre parfumée au romarin has 38% fewer calories (179 kcal vs 291 kcal).
- Terrine de Lièvre parfumée au romarin has 56% less fat (10.2 g vs 23 g).
- Terrine de Lièvre parfumée au romarin has 44% less saturated fat (4 g vs 7.1 g).
- Terrine de Lièvre parfumée au romarin has 60% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Terrine de Lièvre parfumée au romarin has 18% more protein (17 g vs 14 g).
- Terrine de Lièvre parfumée au romarin has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
La Terrine de lièvre à la sarriette et aux noisettes
Not available.
Terrine de Lièvre parfumée au romarin
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: La Terrine de lièvre à la sarriette et aux noisettes or Terrine de Lièvre parfumée au romarin?
Overall, Terrine de Lièvre parfumée au romarin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Terrine de Lièvre parfumée au romarin has fewer calories: 179 kcal versus 291 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Terrine de Lièvre parfumée au romarin has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.