La rêveuse, pêche abricots verveine vs Pirulo mix
Overall, La rêveuse, pêche abricots verveine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | La rêveuse, pêche abricots v... | Pirulo mix |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 75 kcal | 68 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 17 g | 17 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pirulo mix has no fat, while La rêveuse, pêche abricots verveine has 0.5 g.
- La rêveuse, pêche abricots verveine has 100% more fiber (0.8 g vs 0 g).
- La rêveuse, pêche abricots verveine has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
La rêveuse, pêche abricots verveine
Eau, purée de pêche 27%, purée d'abricot 18%, sucre, jus de citron, jus de citron concentré, stabilisant : gomme guar, infusion de verveine citronnée 0,1%
Pirulo mix
Eau, sucre, sirop de glucose-fructose, jus de citron à base de concentré (4,1%), jus d'orange à base de concentré (1,6%), purée de fraise (1,1%), stabilisant (gomme guar), arômes naturels de citron, colorants (caroténoïdes, turmeric), jus de betterave rouge concentré, arômes naturels d'orange et autres arômes naturels, acidifiant (acide citrique), arômes naturels.
FAQ
Which is healthier: La rêveuse, pêche abricots verveine or Pirulo mix?
Overall, La rêveuse, pêche abricots verveine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pirulo mix has fewer calories: 68 kcal versus 75 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
La rêveuse, pêche abricots verveine has less sugar: 17 g versus 17 g per 100 g.