Küstencola vs Fanta tops lemon 1.5l
Overall, Fanta tops lemon 1.5l has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Küstencola | Fanta tops lemon 1.5l |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 38 kcal | 20 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 9.5 g | 4.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 3 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fanta tops lemon 1.5l has 47% fewer calories (20 kcal vs 38 kcal).
- Fanta tops lemon 1.5l has 49% less sugar (4.8 g vs 9.5 g).
- Fanta tops lemon 1.5l has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Küstencola
Wasser, Zucker, Kohlensäure, Ammonsulfit-Zuckerkulör, Phosphorsäure, Aroma Koffein, natürliches Aroma
Fanta tops lemon 1.5l
ماء, سكر, عصير ليمون, ثاني أكسيد الكربون, نكهات طبيعية, حمض الستريك, بنزوات الصوديوم, صمغ عربي, استرات الجليسيرول, صبغة الكلوروفيل, صبغة الكاروتين
FAQ
Which is healthier: Küstencola or Fanta tops lemon 1.5l?
Overall, Fanta tops lemon 1.5l has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fanta tops lemon 1.5l has fewer calories: 20 kcal versus 38 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fanta tops lemon 1.5l has less sugar: 4.8 g versus 9.5 g per 100 g.