Kriek Original vs Faro
Overall, Kriek Original has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Kriek Original | Faro |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 49 kcal | 399 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2.7 g | 99.8 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kriek Original has 88% fewer calories (49 kcal vs 399 kcal).
- Kriek Original has 97% less sugar (2.7 g vs 99.8 g).
- Kriek Original has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Faro is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Kriek Original lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Kriek Original
Eau, malt d'orge, froment, sucres, jus concentré de cerises (0,84%) et de fruits, houblon, épices, arômes, colorant : E150c, antioxygène : E300.
Faro
sucre candi
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kriek Original or Faro?
Overall, Kriek Original has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kriek Original has fewer calories: 49 kcal versus 399 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kriek Original has less sugar: 2.7 g versus 99.8 g per 100 g.