Kraft Malz vs Camden Pale Ale
Overall, Camden Pale Ale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kraft Malz | Camden Pale Ale |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 42 kcal | 37 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 8.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.4 g | — |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 0.3 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Camden Pale Ale has 12% fewer calories (37 kcal vs 42 kcal).
- Camden Pale Ale has 94% less sugar (0.5 g vs 8.3 g).
- Camden Pale Ale is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Kraft Malz
Wasser, _Gerstenmalz_, Glucose-Fructose-Sirup, Hopfenextrakt, Gärungskohlensäure.
Camden Pale Ale
Water, _Malted barley_, _wheat_, hops, yeast
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kraft Malz or Camden Pale Ale?
Overall, Camden Pale Ale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Camden Pale Ale has fewer calories: 37 kcal versus 42 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Camden Pale Ale has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 8.3 g per 100 g.