Comparison

Koorene pudding vaniljega vs Pollo alla diavola con patate

Overall, Pollo alla diavola con patate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKoorene pudding vaniljegaPollo alla diavola con patat...
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 121 kcal 102 kcal
Fat 5.4 g 1.4 g
Saturated fat 3.4 g 0.2 g
Sugars 14 g 0.4 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.9 g
Fiber 0.3 g 1.3 g
Protein 3.2 g 10 g
Additives40
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pollo alla diavola con patate has 16% fewer calories (102 kcal vs 121 kcal).
  • Pollo alla diavola con patate has 74% less fat (1.4 g vs 5.4 g).
  • Pollo alla diavola con patate has 94% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 3.4 g).
  • Pollo alla diavola con patate has 97% less sugar (0.4 g vs 14 g).
  • Koorene pudding vaniljega has 83% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Pollo alla diavola con patate has 77% more fiber (1.3 g vs 0.3 g).
  • Pollo alla diavola con patate has 68% more protein (10 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Pollo alla diavola con patate has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Koorene pudding vaniljega lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Koorene pudding vaniljega

pasteurized MILK, CREAM, sugar, modified starch, skimmed MILK powder, stabilizers: xanthan gum, carrageenan; flavouring, salt, colour: carotenes, vanilla seed powder 0.012%

Pollo alla diavola con patate

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Koorene pudding vaniljega or Pollo alla diavola con patate?

Overall, Pollo alla diavola con patate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pollo alla diavola con patate has fewer calories: 102 kcal versus 121 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pollo alla diavola con patate has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 14 g per 100 g.

More comparisons