Comparison

Kong Strong Wild Power Energy Drink Sugar Free vs Red Bull

Overall, Kong Strong Wild Power Energy Drink Sugar Free has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKong Strong Wild Power Energ...Red Bull
Nutri-Score c e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 4 kcal 46 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 0 g 11 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 0 g 0 g
Additives53
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kong Strong Wild Power Energy Drink Sugar Free has 91% fewer calories (4 kcal vs 46 kcal).
  • Kong Strong Wild Power Energy Drink Sugar Free has 100% less sugar (0 g vs 11 g).
  • Kong Strong Wild Power Energy Drink Sugar Free has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Kong Strong Wild Power Energy Drink Sugar Free

Carbonated Water, Acid: Citric Acid; Acidity Regulator: Sodium Citrates; 0.4% Taurine, Flavouring, Colour: Plain Caramel; Sweeteners: Acesulfame K, Aspartame, Caffeine, Niacin, Pantothenic Acid, Vitamin B6, Vitamin B12. *Contains a source of Phenylalanine

Red Bull

Wasser, Saccharose, Glucose, Säuerung mittel (Citronensäure), Kohlensäure, Taurin (0,4% Säureregulatoren (Natriumcarbonate, Magnesium carbonate), Koffein (0,03 %), Vitamine (Niacin, Pantothensäure, B6, B12), Aromen, Farbstoffe (Zuckerkulör, Riboflavine).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kong Strong Wild Power Energy Drink Sugar Free or Red Bull?

Overall, Kong Strong Wild Power Energy Drink Sugar Free has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kong Strong Wild Power Energy Drink Sugar Free has fewer calories: 4 kcal versus 46 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kong Strong Wild Power Energy Drink Sugar Free has less sugar: 0 g versus 11 g per 100 g.

More comparisons