Comparison

Kinder Eggs Cacao x12 oeufs fourrés vs Bueno EGGS

Overall, Bueno EGGS has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKinder Eggs Cacao x12 oeufs...Bueno EGGS
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 573 kcal 575 kcal
Fat 36.5 g 36.7 g
Saturated fat 20 g 18.2 g
Sugars 49.9 g 47.4 g
Salt 0.3 g 0.3 g
Protein 7.2 g 8.4 g
Additives63
AllergensGluten, Milk, Nuts, SoybeansGluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bueno EGGS has 14% more protein (8.4 g vs 7.2 g).

Ingredients

Kinder Eggs Cacao x12 oeufs fourrés

Chocolat supérieur au lait 34% (sucre, lait en poudre, beurre de cacao, pâte de cacao, émulsifiants : lécithines [soja], vanilline), sucre, graisses végétales (palme, karité), lait écrémé en poudre 8,5%, lait en poudre 4%, farine de froment, cacao maigre 2,5%, noisettes, beurre concentré, émulsifiants : lécithines [soja], vanilline, poudres à lever (carbonate acide de sodium, carbonate acide d'ammonium), sel.

Bueno EGGS

Fine MILK chocolate 52.5% (sugar, whole MILK powder, cocoa butter, palm oil), HAZELNUTS 8%, skimmed MILK powder, cocoa mass, WHEAT flour, emulsifier: lecithins (SOYA), fat reduced cocoa, vanillin, raising agent (sodium bicarbonate), salt. (UK) Ferrero, 889 Greenford Road, Greenford, UB6 OHE. (ROI) Ferrero, Kinsale Road, Cork. www.kinder.com CONSUMER CARELINE: 00 44 330 0538943 80 ge

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kinder Eggs Cacao x12 oeufs fourrés or Bueno EGGS?

Overall, Bueno EGGS has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kinder Eggs Cacao x12 oeufs fourrés has fewer calories: 573 kcal versus 575 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bueno EGGS has less sugar: 47.4 g versus 49.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons