Kesselchips Rosemary & Sea Salt vs Bio Kartoffelchips
Overall, Bio Kartoffelchips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Kesselchips Rosemary & Sea Salt
Bio Kartoffelchips
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kesselchips Rosemary & Sea S... | Bio Kartoffelchips |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 507 kcal | 477 kcal |
| Fat | 28 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.6 g | 2.6 g |
| Sugars | 2.1 g | 2.3 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 5.2 g |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 5.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bio Kartoffelchips has 14% less fat (24 g vs 28 g).
- Kesselchips Rosemary & Sea Salt has 13% more protein (6.3 g vs 5.5 g).
- Bio Kartoffelchips has the better Nutri-Score.
- Bio Kartoffelchips is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Kesselchips Rosemary & Sea Salt
Kartoffeln, Sonnenblumenöl, natürliches Aroma, Zucker, Meersalz, Hefeextrakt, Gewürz, Kräuter (Rosmarin,Thymian), Knoblauchpulver, Zwiebelpulver, Gewürzextrakte.
Bio Kartoffelchips
71% Kartoffeln, Sonnenblumenöl, 1,6% Tomatenpulver', Meersalz, Zucker', Gewürze¹ (Knoblauch', schwarzer Pfeffer', Zwiebel'), 0,35% Kräuter¹ (Basilikum', Bohnenkraut, Petersilie!), Reismehl', Paprikaextrakt', Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure. ¹aus kontrolliert ökologischem Anbau. Dieses Produkt ist glutenfrei.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kesselchips Rosemary & Sea Salt or Bio Kartoffelchips?
Overall, Bio Kartoffelchips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bio Kartoffelchips has fewer calories: 477 kcal versus 507 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kesselchips Rosemary & Sea Salt has less sugar: 2.1 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.