Kaviavr Creme aus Heringsrogen vs Kalles Original
Overall, Kalles Original has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kaviavr Creme aus Heringsrog... | Kalles Original |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 450 kcal | 400 kcal |
| Fat | 45 g | 34 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.9 g | 2.4 g |
| Sugars | 5.2 g | 12 g |
| Salt | 5.2 g | 6.2 g |
| Protein | 6.1 g | 8.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kalles Original has 11% fewer calories (400 kcal vs 450 kcal).
- Kalles Original has 24% less fat (34 g vs 45 g).
- Kalles Original has 17% less saturated fat (2.4 g vs 2.9 g).
- Kaviavr Creme aus Heringsrogen has 57% less sugar (5.2 g vs 12 g).
- Kaviavr Creme aus Heringsrogen has 17% less salt (5.2 g vs 6.2 g).
- Kalles Original has 28% more protein (8.5 g vs 6.1 g).
- Kalles Original is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Kalles Original lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Kaviavr Creme aus Heringsrogen
Heringsrogen (41%), Rapsöl, Salz, Zucker, Trinkwasser, Dilspitzen. Verdickungsmittel: Guarkernmehl; Konservierungsstoff: Bonzoesäure; Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure Dillkrautol (0,01% ).
Kalles Original
Rökt sockersaltad TORSKrom (52%), rapsolja, socker, potatisflingor, tomatpuré, salt, konserveringsmedel (kaliumsorbat), antioxidationsmedel (askorbinsyra).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kaviavr Creme aus Heringsrogen or Kalles Original?
Overall, Kalles Original has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kalles Original has fewer calories: 400 kcal versus 450 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kaviavr Creme aus Heringsrogen has less sugar: 5.2 g versus 12 g per 100 g.