Katzen Pfötchen vs Süße Schachtel - Erdbeer Lakritz Stücke
Overall, Katzen Pfötchen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Katzen Pfötchen | Süße Schachtel - Erdbeer Lak... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 357 kcal | 362 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 2.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 1.2 g |
| Sugars | 58 g | 62.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 3.3 g |
| Additives | 2 | 7 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Katzen Pfötchen has 92% less fat (0.2 g vs 2.4 g).
- Katzen Pfötchen has 92% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.2 g).
- Katzen Pfötchen has 88% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Süße Schachtel - Erdbeer Lakritz Stücke has 88% more protein (3.3 g vs 0.4 g).
- Only Süße Schachtel - Erdbeer Lakritz Stücke lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Katzen Pfötchen
Zucker, Glukosesirup, Glukose-Fruktose-Sirup, Stärke, 8.7% Süßholzsaft, brauner Zuckersirup, modifizierte Stärke, Aromen, Kräuterauszüge, Sonnenblumenöl, Überzugsmittel: Carnaubawachs. Kann Spuren von Milch enthalten.
Süße Schachtel - Erdbeer Lakritz Stücke
Zucker, Melasse, _Weizenmehl_, Glukosesirup, pflanzliches Fett (Shea, Kokos), Gelatine, Süßholzextrakt, Stabilisator (E422), Salz, Aromen, Farbstoffe (E120, E153), Säureregulator (E330). Pflanzenöl (Raps, Sonnenblume), Überzugsmitte (E901, E903).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Katzen Pfötchen or Süße Schachtel - Erdbeer Lakritz Stücke?
Overall, Katzen Pfötchen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Katzen Pfötchen has fewer calories: 357 kcal versus 362 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Katzen Pfötchen has less sugar: 58 g versus 62.5 g per 100 g.