Comparison
Kaki vs Kaki bio séché
Overall, Kaki has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kaki | Kaki bio séché |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 69 kcal | 291 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 13.9 g | 57 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.4 g | — |
| Protein | 0.9 g | 2.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kaki has 76% fewer calories (69 kcal vs 291 kcal).
- Kaki has 70% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Kaki has 76% less sugar (13.9 g vs 57 g).
- Kaki bio séché has 70% more protein (2.9 g vs 0.9 g).
- Kaki has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Kaki
Kaki
Kaki bio séché
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kaki or Kaki bio séché?
Overall, Kaki has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kaki has fewer calories: 69 kcal versus 291 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kaki has less sugar: 13.9 g versus 57 g per 100 g.