Comparison
Kafkala vs Krispies
Overall, Kafkala has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kafkala | Krispies |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 349 kcal | 408 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 8.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 4 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 6.4 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | — | 5.9 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kafkala has 14% fewer calories (349 kcal vs 408 kcal).
- Kafkala has 83% less fat (1.5 g vs 8.9 g).
- Kafkala has 90% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 4 g).
- Kafkala has 47% less sugar (3.4 g vs 6.4 g).
- Kafkala has 44% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.4 g).
- Kafkala has 21% more protein (14 g vs 11 g).
- Kafkala has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Kafkala lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Kafkala
Αλεύρι σίτου και κριθαρένιο αλεύρι περιέχουν γλουτένη, νερό, προζύμι (αλεύρι σίτου περιέχει γλουτένη, νερό), αλάτι, μαγιά
Krispies
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kafkala or Krispies?
Overall, Kafkala has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kafkala has fewer calories: 349 kcal versus 408 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kafkala has less sugar: 3.4 g versus 6.4 g per 100 g.