Comparison
Kaffeerahm vs Kaffesahne
Overall, Kaffesahne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kaffeerahm | Kaffesahne |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 163 kcal | 136 kcal |
| Fat | 15 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 9 g | 8 g |
| Sugars | 4 g | 3.9 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 3 g | 3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kaffesahne has 17% fewer calories (136 kcal vs 163 kcal).
- Kaffesahne has 20% less fat (12 g vs 15 g).
- Kaffesahne has 11% less saturated fat (8 g vs 9 g).
Ingredients
Kaffeerahm
Not available.
Kaffesahne
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kaffeerahm or Kaffesahne?
Overall, Kaffesahne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kaffesahne has fewer calories: 136 kcal versus 163 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kaffesahne has less sugar: 3.9 g versus 4 g per 100 g.