Jogurt Pur Mango-Passionsfrucht & Dattel vs Yaourt Mangue Bio
Overall, Jogurt Pur Mango-Passionsfrucht & Dattel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Jogurt Pur Mango-Passionsfrucht & Dattel
Yaourt Mangue Bio
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Jogurt Pur Mango-Passionsfru... | Yaourt Mangue Bio |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 87 kcal | 98 kcal |
| Fat | 2.6 g | 2.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.5 g | 1.7 g |
| Sugars | 9.9 g | 13.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 2.1 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 3.9 g | 3.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Yogourt | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Jogurt Pur Mango-Passionsfrucht & Dattel has 11% fewer calories (87 kcal vs 98 kcal).
- Jogurt Pur Mango-Passionsfrucht & Dattel has 27% less sugar (9.9 g vs 13.6 g).
- Jogurt Pur Mango-Passionsfrucht & Dattel has 39% more fiber (2.1 g vs 1.3 g).
- Yaourt Mangue Bio has the better Nutri-Score.
- Jogurt Pur Mango-Passionsfrucht & Dattel is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Jogurt Pur Mango-Passionsfrucht & Dattel lists: Yogourt.
Ingredients
Jogurt Pur Mango-Passionsfrucht & Dattel
_Yogourt_ sans lactose, mangue 17 %, dattes 7,5%, jus de fruit de la passion 3%.
Yaourt Mangue Bio
Yogourt sans lactose, sucre de canne, 6 % mangue, amidon de riz, lactase.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Jogurt Pur Mango-Passionsfrucht & Dattel or Yaourt Mangue Bio?
Overall, Jogurt Pur Mango-Passionsfrucht & Dattel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Jogurt Pur Mango-Passionsfrucht & Dattel has fewer calories: 87 kcal versus 98 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Jogurt Pur Mango-Passionsfrucht & Dattel has less sugar: 9.9 g versus 13.6 g per 100 g.