Iced Love Himbeeren vs Chocolate Raspberries
Overall, Chocolate Raspberries has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Iced Love Himbeeren | Chocolate Raspberries |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 329 kcal | 389 kcal |
| Fat | 20.4 g | 25.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 12.6 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 29.1 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 5.2 g | — |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 4.6 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Iced Love Himbeeren has 15% fewer calories (329 kcal vs 389 kcal).
- Iced Love Himbeeren has 19% less fat (20.4 g vs 25.1 g).
- Chocolate Raspberries has 92% less saturated fat (1 g vs 12.6 g).
- Chocolate Raspberries has 97% less sugar (1 g vs 29.1 g).
- Chocolate Raspberries has 22% more protein (4.6 g vs 3.6 g).
- Chocolate Raspberries has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Iced Love Himbeeren lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Iced Love Himbeeren
Tiefgefrorene Himbeeren mit weißer und dunkler Schokolade überzogen Zutaten: 45% Himbeeren, 27,5% weiße Schokolade' (Zucker, Kakaobutter, Vollmilchpulver Kokosfett, Emulgator: Lecithine [enthält Soja]; natürliches Vanille-Aroma), 27,5% dunkle Schokolade (Kakaomasse, Zucker, Kakaobutter, Kokosfett, Emulgator: Lecithine (enthält Soja); natürliches Vanille-Aroma).
Chocolate Raspberries
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Iced Love Himbeeren or Chocolate Raspberries?
Overall, Chocolate Raspberries has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Iced Love Himbeeren has fewer calories: 329 kcal versus 389 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chocolate Raspberries has less sugar: 1 g versus 29.1 g per 100 g.