Comparison
Huile de table vs Optima
Overall, Optima has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Huile de table | Optima |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 900 kcal | 900 kcal |
| Fat | 100 g | 100 g |
| Saturated fat | 14 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Optima has 14% less saturated fat (12 g vs 14 g).
- Only Huile de table lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Huile de table
Huiles végétales (Soja), Vitamine A, Vitamine D3
Optima
huile de tournesol raffinée, huile d'olive vierge extra, vitamine D.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Huile de table or Optima?
Overall, Optima has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Huile de table has fewer calories: 900 kcal versus 900 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Huile de table has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.