Hipro façon stracciatella vs High protein saveur noix de coco
Overall, High protein saveur noix de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Hipro façon stracciatella
High protein saveur noix de coco
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hipro façon stracciatella | High protein saveur noix de... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 57 kcal | 53 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 3.1 g | 2.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 9.4 g | 9.2 g |
| Additives | 7 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- High protein saveur noix de coco has 17% less sugar (2.6 g vs 3.1 g).
Ingredients
Hipro façon stracciatella
_Lait_ écrémé (Origine : France), _lait_ écrémé concentré (Origine: UE), eau, copeaux de cacao (0,5%) (beurre de cacao, poudre de cacao, poudre de cacao degraissée), épaississants (amidon modifié, pectine de fruits), ferments lactiques (_lait_), arôme, correcteurs d’acidité (acide lactique, citrate de sodium, citrate de calcium), édulcorants (acésulfame-K, sucralose), vitamine D
High protein saveur noix de coco
_Lait_ écrémé 92%, eau, noix de coco râpée 0,5%, amidon de maïs, arômes naturels, épaississant : pectines, édulcorant : sucralose, ferments _lactiques_, vitamine D. Lait origine France.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hipro façon stracciatella or High protein saveur noix de coco?
Overall, High protein saveur noix de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
High protein saveur noix de coco has fewer calories: 53 kcal versus 57 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
High protein saveur noix de coco has less sugar: 2.6 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.