Comparison
Hipro vs Pouch cremosa banana
Overall, Pouch cremosa banana has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hipro | Pouch cremosa banana |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 52 kcal | 70 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 4.8 g | 3.4 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 7.6 g | 12.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hipro has 26% fewer calories (52 kcal vs 70 kcal).
- Pouch cremosa banana has 29% less sugar (3.4 g vs 4.8 g).
- Pouch cremosa banana has 39% more protein (12.5 g vs 7.6 g).
Ingredients
Hipro
Not available.
Pouch cremosa banana
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hipro or Pouch cremosa banana?
Overall, Pouch cremosa banana has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hipro has fewer calories: 52 kcal versus 70 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pouch cremosa banana has less sugar: 3.4 g versus 4.8 g per 100 g.