HERTA TGM pâte brisée pur beurre 280g LOT 3 vs HERTA TGM pâte sablée pur beurre 280g
Overall, HERTA TGM pâte brisée pur beurre 280g LOT 3 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
HERTA TGM pâte brisée pur beurre 280g LOT 3
HERTA TGM pâte sablée pur beurre 280g
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | HERTA TGM pâte brisée pur be... | HERTA TGM pâte sablée pur be... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 367 kcal | 412 kcal |
| Fat | 18 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 12 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 17 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 5.9 g | 5.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk | Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- HERTA TGM pâte brisée pur beurre 280g LOT 3 has 11% fewer calories (367 kcal vs 412 kcal).
- HERTA TGM pâte brisée pur beurre 280g LOT 3 has 88% less sugar (2 g vs 17 g).
- HERTA TGM pâte sablée pur beurre 280g has 92% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.1 g).
Ingredients
HERTA TGM pâte brisée pur beurre 280g LOT 3
Farine de BLÉ, Eau, BEURRE pâtissier 18%, Alcool, Sel, Jus de citron concentré. Peut contenir : SOJA, MOUTARDE.
HERTA TGM pâte sablée pur beurre 280g
Farine de blé, Beurre pâtissier 18%, Sucre, Eau, Alcool, Jus de citron concentré, Sel. Peut contenir : Soja, Moutarde.
FAQ
Which is healthier: HERTA TGM pâte brisée pur beurre 280g LOT 3 or HERTA TGM pâte sablée pur beurre 280g?
Overall, HERTA TGM pâte brisée pur beurre 280g LOT 3 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
HERTA TGM pâte brisée pur beurre 280g LOT 3 has fewer calories: 367 kcal versus 412 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
HERTA TGM pâte brisée pur beurre 280g LOT 3 has less sugar: 2 g versus 17 g per 100 g.