Hallabi vs Brat- und Grilltaler Natur
Overall, Brat- und Grilltaler Natur has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hallabi | Brat- und Grilltaler Natur |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 298 kcal | 241 kcal |
| Fat | 24 g | 19 g |
| Saturated fat | 15 g | 13 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 3 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Brat- und Grilltaler Natur has 19% fewer calories (241 kcal vs 298 kcal).
- Brat- und Grilltaler Natur has 21% less fat (19 g vs 24 g).
- Brat- und Grilltaler Natur has 13% less saturated fat (13 g vs 15 g).
- Hallabi has 40% less sugar (1.2 g vs 2 g).
- Brat- und Grilltaler Natur has 38% less salt (1.9 g vs 3 g).
- Hallabi has 11% more protein (19 g vs 17 g).
- Brat- und Grilltaler Natur has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Hallabi
Pasteurisierte Kuhmilch, Salz, Calciumchlorid mikrobielles Lab. Hergestellt in Bulgarien aus EU Milch.
Brat- und Grilltaler Natur
Milch*, Speisesalz, Käsereikulturen, mikrobielles Lab. *aus kontrolliert biologischer Landwirtschaft. LABEL INT ERNATIONAL LABEL.COM VEGETARISCH Zubereitungshinweis: Der Bio Brat - und Grilltaler ist bereits vorgegrillt und vielseitig verwendbar, Zubereitung in der Pfanne und auf dem Grill: Käsescheiben beidseitig
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hallabi or Brat- und Grilltaler Natur?
Overall, Brat- und Grilltaler Natur has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Brat- und Grilltaler Natur has fewer calories: 241 kcal versus 298 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hallabi has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 2 g per 100 g.