Comparison

Haché poulet et graines lin et tournesol vs 4 Steaks hachés de poulet

Overall, 4 Steaks hachés de poulet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientHaché poulet et graines lin...4 Steaks hachés de poulet
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 4 1
Calories 207 kcal 151 kcal
Fat 11 g 8 g
Saturated fat 2.5 g 2.1 g
Sugars 1.9 g 0 g
Salt 0.9 g 0.2 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 20 g 19 g
Additives00
AllergensSoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • 4 Steaks hachés de poulet has 27% fewer calories (151 kcal vs 207 kcal).
  • 4 Steaks hachés de poulet has 27% less fat (8 g vs 11 g).
  • 4 Steaks hachés de poulet has 16% less saturated fat (2.1 g vs 2.5 g).
  • 4 Steaks hachés de poulet has no sugar, while Haché poulet et graines lin et tournesol has 1.9 g.
  • 4 Steaks hachés de poulet has 81% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.9 g).
  • 4 Steaks hachés de poulet has the better Nutri-Score.
  • 4 Steaks hachés de poulet is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Haché poulet et graines lin et tournesol lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Haché poulet et graines lin et tournesol

Viande de filet de poulet 67,5% (origine : France), eau, protéines de soja 8,5%, graines (lin 2,6%, tournesol 2,6%), sirop de glucose, fécule de pomme de terre, arôme naturel de poivre avec autres arômes naturels, sel.

4 Steaks hachés de poulet

poulet

FAQ

Which is healthier: Haché poulet et graines lin et tournesol or 4 Steaks hachés de poulet?

Overall, 4 Steaks hachés de poulet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

4 Steaks hachés de poulet has fewer calories: 151 kcal versus 207 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

4 Steaks hachés de poulet has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons