Comparison

Habitas fritas en aceite de oliva vs Full Medammes - Durra

Overall, Full Medammes - Durra has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientHabitas fritas en aceite de...Full Medammes - Durra
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 87 kcal 72 kcal
Fat 4 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0.7 g 0 g
Sugars 1.5 g 0 g
Salt 1 g 0.1 g
Fiber — 4 g
Protein 4.6 g 5 g
Additives11
AllergensSulphur dioxide and sulphitesNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Full Medammes - Durra has 17% fewer calories (72 kcal vs 87 kcal).
  • Full Medammes - Durra has no fat, while Habitas fritas en aceite de oliva has 4 g.
  • Full Medammes - Durra has no saturated fat, while Habitas fritas en aceite de oliva has 0.7 g.
  • Full Medammes - Durra has no sugar, while Habitas fritas en aceite de oliva has 1.5 g.
  • Full Medammes - Durra has 95% less salt (0.1 g vs 1 g).
  • Full Medammes - Durra has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Habitas fritas en aceite de oliva lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Habitas fritas en aceite de oliva

64% habitas fritas (contienen _sulfitos_), 33% aceite de oliva, 1% aceite de girasol, sal y acidulante: ácido cítrico.

Full Medammes - Durra

Fève (65.8%), Eau (32%), Sel (2%), Stabilisateur de couleur (EDTA) E386 (0,1%), Acidifiams E330 (0,05%), Antioxydant E300 (0,05%). Fave bönor (65.8%) Vatten (32%)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Habitas fritas en aceite de oliva or Full Medammes - Durra?

Overall, Full Medammes - Durra has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Full Medammes - Durra has fewer calories: 72 kcal versus 87 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Full Medammes - Durra has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons