Glowberry vs Hydration Accelerator
Overall, Glowberry has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Glowberry | Hydration Accelerator |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 227 kcal | 185 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 22.7 g | 46.3 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 11.6 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 5 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hydration Accelerator has 19% fewer calories (185 kcal vs 227 kcal).
- Glowberry has 51% less sugar (22.7 g vs 46.3 g).
- Glowberry has 90% less salt (1.1 g vs 11.6 g).
- Glowberry has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Glowberry
CITRIC ACID, COCONUT WATER CONCENTRATE, DIPOTASSIUM PHOSPHATE, MAGNESIUM CITRATE, ASCORBIC ACID (VITAMIN C), SUCRALOSE, SEA SALT, L-ISOLEUCINE, L-LEUCINE, L-VALINE, ACESULFAME POTASSIUM, NATURAL FLAVOR, D-ALPHA TOCOPHERYL ACETATE (VITAMIN E), PYRIDOXINE HYDROCHLORIDE (VITAMIN B-6), RETINYL PALMITATE (VITAMIN A), CYANOCOBALAMIN (VITAMIN B-12). CONTAINS COCONUT
Hydration Accelerator
Sugar, Vitamin C (Ascorbic Acid), Sodium Chloride (Salt), Natural and Artificial Flavors, Potassium Chloride, Citric Acid, Sucralose, Malic Acid, Magnesium Oxide, Silicon Dioxide, Zinc Oxide, Vitamin B6 (Pyridoxine HCI), Vitamin B12 (Cyanocobalamin)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Glowberry or Hydration Accelerator?
Overall, Glowberry has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hydration Accelerator has fewer calories: 185 kcal versus 227 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Glowberry has less sugar: 22.7 g versus 46.3 g per 100 g.