Gloria vs PH-kalk 2 kg
Overall, PH-kalk 2 kg has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Gloria | PH-kalk 2 kg |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 490 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 26 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 13.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 46 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- PH-kalk 2 kg has no calories, while Gloria has 490 kcal.
- PH-kalk 2 kg has no fat, while Gloria has 26 g.
- PH-kalk 2 kg has no saturated fat, while Gloria has 13.1 g.
- PH-kalk 2 kg has no sugar, while Gloria has 46 g.
- PH-kalk 2 kg has no salt, while Gloria has 0.9 g.
- Gloria has 100% more protein (18 g vs 0 g).
- Only Gloria lists: Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Gloria
lait écrémé en poudre, huile de palme , lactosérum en poudre ,sucre , antiaglomérant, carbonate de calcium, émulsifiant , lécithine de soja , vitamines pyrophosphate ferrique , lait , soja
PH-kalk 2 kg
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Gloria or PH-kalk 2 kg?
Overall, PH-kalk 2 kg has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
PH-kalk 2 kg has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 490 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
PH-kalk 2 kg has less sugar: 0 g versus 46 g per 100 g.