Getränkesirup Orangen-Geschmack vs Sirop d'Orange
Overall, Getränkesirup Orangen-Geschmack has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Getränkesirup Orangen-Geschm... | Sirop d'Orange |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 2 kcal | 328 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 80.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Additives | 7 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Getränkesirup Orangen-Geschmack has 99% fewer calories (2 kcal vs 328 kcal).
- Getränkesirup Orangen-Geschmack has 99% less sugar (0.5 g vs 80.7 g).
- Sirop d'Orange has 100% more protein (0.3 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Getränkesirup Orangen-Geschmack
Wasser, Orangensaftkonzentrat, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure, konzentrierter Orangenextrakt, Süßungsmittel: Acesulfam K, Natrium - cyclamat, natürliches Aroma, Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure, Kaliummetabisulfit, Stabilisator: Guarkernmehl, Konservierungsstoff: Kaliumsorbat, Farbstoff: Caratin *Enthält Sulfite
Sirop d'Orange
Sirop de glucose-fructose et sucre, eau, jus d'orange (23 %), jus de citron (24 %) de concentrat, stabilisants E414-E445, arôme naturel d'orange, antioxydant : acide ascorbique, colorants : E160a - E160a, conservateur : E202.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Getränkesirup Orangen-Geschmack or Sirop d'Orange?
Overall, Getränkesirup Orangen-Geschmack has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Getränkesirup Orangen-Geschmack has fewer calories: 2 kcal versus 328 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Getränkesirup Orangen-Geschmack has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 80.7 g per 100 g.