GenePro vs Mocha Java Chip
Overall, GenePro has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | GenePro | Mocha Java Chip |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 400 kcal | 363 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 3.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 6.6 g |
| Protein | — | 66 g |
| Additives | 0 | 8 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk, Nuts, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- GenePro has no fat, while Mocha Java Chip has 5 g.
- GenePro has no saturated fat, while Mocha Java Chip has 3.3 g.
- GenePro has 73% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.7 g).
- Mocha Java Chip has 100% more fiber (6.6 g vs 0 g).
- GenePro has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Mocha Java Chip lists: Milk, Nuts, Soybeans.
Ingredients
GenePro
(iOwhey®), iOwhey s a Registered Trademark product and used with permission by Plasma Nutrition, Inc.Ⓡ ** THIS PRODUCT CONTAINS MILK WARNING *In clinical research, the bio availability of GENEPRO is equivalent to 33g of re whey protein.
Mocha Java Chip
WHEY PROTEIN ISOLATE, MICELLAR CASEIN, NATURAL & ARTIFICIAL FLAVOR MEDIUM CHAIN TRIGLYCERIDES, FIBER BLEND (CELLULOSE GUM, XANTHAN GUM, CARRAGEENAN), COCOA POWDER, BOLD ROAST INSTANT COFFEE, GUM ACACIA, MALTRIN SALT, DIGESTIVE ENZYMES (PROTEASES, AMYLASE, CELLULASE, LACTASE, LIPASE) SUCRALOSE, ACESULFAME POTASSIUM. CONTAINS: MILK, TREE NUTS (COCONUT), SOY.
FAQ
Which is healthier: GenePro or Mocha Java Chip?
Overall, GenePro has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mocha Java Chip has fewer calories: 363 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
GenePro has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.