Gelierzucker 2:1 vs Gelierrübenzucker 2:1
Overall, Gelierzucker 2:1 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Gelierzucker 2:1 | Gelierrübenzucker 2:1 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 270 kcal | 397 kcal |
| Fat | 3.6 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 6.4 g | 98 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 8.2 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 3 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gelierzucker 2:1 has 32% fewer calories (270 kcal vs 397 kcal).
- Gelierrübenzucker 2:1 has no fat, while Gelierzucker 2:1 has 3.6 g.
- Gelierrübenzucker 2:1 has no saturated fat, while Gelierzucker 2:1 has 0.5 g.
- Gelierzucker 2:1 has 93% less sugar (6.4 g vs 98 g).
- Gelierrübenzucker 2:1 has 97% less salt (0 g vs 1.4 g).
- Gelierzucker 2:1 has 100% more fiber (2.9 g vs 0 g).
- Gelierzucker 2:1 has 100% more protein (8.2 g vs 0 g).
- Gelierzucker 2:1 has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Gelierzucker 2:1
Zucker, Geliermittel Pektine, Säuerungsmittel (Citronensäure), pflanzliches Öl (Palm, Kokos), Konservierungsstoff (Kaliumsorbat). Trocken lagern.
Gelierrübenzucker 2:1
Rübenzucker (98%) Geliermittel Pektine, Säuerungsmittel Citronensäure.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Gelierzucker 2:1 or Gelierrübenzucker 2:1?
Overall, Gelierzucker 2:1 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gelierzucker 2:1 has fewer calories: 270 kcal versus 397 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gelierzucker 2:1 has less sugar: 6.4 g versus 98 g per 100 g.