Gebrannte Mandeln vs Kakaóporos, tejcsokoládés mandula
Overall, Gebrannte Mandeln has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Gebrannte Mandeln
Kakaóporos, tejcsokoládés mandula
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Gebrannte Mandeln | Kakaóporos, tejcsokoládés ma... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 582 kcal | 591 kcal |
| Fat | 38 g | 41 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.5 g | 17 g |
| Sugars | 41 g | 40 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 6.4 g | 5 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gebrannte Mandeln has 79% less saturated fat (3.5 g vs 17 g).
- Gebrannte Mandeln has 22% more fiber (6.4 g vs 5 g).
- Gebrannte Mandeln has 40% more protein (15 g vs 9 g).
- Gebrannte Mandeln has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Gebrannte Mandeln lists: Nuts.
- Only Kakaóporos, tejcsokoládés mandula lists: Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Gebrannte Mandeln
65 % Mandeln, Rohrzucker, Glukosesirup
Kakaóporos, tejcsokoládés mandula
Tejcsokoládé (min. 50%) [cukor, kakaóvaj, kakaómassza, zsíros tejpor, emulgeálószer (szójalecitin), természetes vanilia aroma)], pörkölt, hàntolatlan mandulabél, kakaópor. Tejcsoko - lådéban kakaó szárazanyag legalább 35%, tej szárazanyag legalább 14%. Allergén információ: Tartalmaz mandulát, tejet, szóját. Nyomokban földimogyorót, egyéb dióféléket tartalmazhat!
FAQ
Which is healthier: Gebrannte Mandeln or Kakaóporos, tejcsokoládés mandula?
Overall, Gebrannte Mandeln has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gebrannte Mandeln has fewer calories: 582 kcal versus 591 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kakaóporos, tejcsokoládés mandula has less sugar: 40 g versus 41 g per 100 g.