Gazpacho l'original vs Gazpacho tomate, pastèque & menthe
Overall, Gazpacho tomate, pastèque & menthe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Gazpacho l'original
Gazpacho tomate, pastèque & menthe
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Gazpacho l'original | Gazpacho tomate, pastèque &... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 40 kcal | 21 kcal |
| Fat | 2.2 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 3.3 g | 3.3 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 0.9 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gazpacho tomate, pastèque & menthe has 48% fewer calories (21 kcal vs 40 kcal).
- Gazpacho tomate, pastèque & menthe has no fat, while Gazpacho l'original has 2.2 g.
- Gazpacho tomate, pastèque & menthe has no saturated fat, while Gazpacho l'original has 0.4 g.
- Gazpacho l'original has 42% more fiber (1.2 g vs 0.7 g).
- Gazpacho l'original has 33% more protein (0.9 g vs 0.6 g).
Ingredients
Gazpacho l'original
Tomate,poivron,concombre,oignon,huile d'olive vierge extra (2,2%),vinaigre de vin,sel,ail,jus de citron,teneur en légumes: 94%
Gazpacho tomate, pastèque & menthe
Tomate (36%),pastèque (24%),eau,concombre,jus de citron,sel de mer,sucre,huile d'olive vierge extra (0,2%),menthe (0,15%),teneur en fruits et légumes: 76%
FAQ
Which is healthier: Gazpacho l'original or Gazpacho tomate, pastèque & menthe?
Overall, Gazpacho tomate, pastèque & menthe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gazpacho tomate, pastèque & menthe has fewer calories: 21 kcal versus 40 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gazpacho l'original has less sugar: 3.3 g versus 3.3 g per 100 g.