Garnitures bouchées a la reine vs Garniture pour Bouchées à la Reine
Overall, Garnitures bouchées a la reine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Garnitures bouchées a la rei... | Garniture pour Bouchées à la... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 103 kcal | 136 kcal |
| Fat | 5.2 g | 9.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.3 g | 4.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 3.8 g | 3.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Garnitures bouchées a la reine has 24% fewer calories (103 kcal vs 136 kcal).
- Garnitures bouchées a la reine has 47% less fat (5.2 g vs 9.8 g).
- Garnitures bouchées a la reine has 53% less saturated fat (2.3 g vs 4.9 g).
Ingredients
Garnitures bouchées a la reine
Not available.
Garniture pour Bouchées à la Reine
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Garnitures bouchées a la reine or Garniture pour Bouchées à la Reine?
Overall, Garnitures bouchées a la reine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Garnitures bouchées a la reine has fewer calories: 103 kcal versus 136 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Garnitures bouchées a la reine has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.