Gallo risotto perfetto milanese vs Risotto Al Funghi Porcini
Overall, Risotto Al Funghi Porcini has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Gallo risotto perfetto milanese
Risotto Al Funghi Porcini
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Gallo risotto perfetto milan... | Risotto Al Funghi Porcini |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 346 kcal | 335 kcal |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 1.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 2.3 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | — |
| Protein | 6.8 g | 9.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Risotto Al Funghi Porcini has 50% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1.2 g).
- Risotto Al Funghi Porcini has 17% less salt (1.9 g vs 2.3 g).
- Risotto Al Funghi Porcini has 27% more protein (9.3 g vs 6.8 g).
- Only Gallo risotto perfetto milanese lists: Milk.
- Only Risotto Al Funghi Porcini lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Gallo risotto perfetto milanese
Riso parboiled, fecola di patate, maltodestrina, formaggio fuso, amido di riso cipolla, zucchero, estratto di lievito, sale, aromi naturali, zafferano 0,03%.
Risotto Al Funghi Porcini
Carnaroli ris 91%, tørket steinsopp 3,2%, havsalt, rismel, løk, selleri, gulrot, persille, purreløk, ekstra virgin olivenolje, hvitløk, maisstivelse, miso (soya, ris, vann, salt, koji), gjærekstrakt og krydder.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Gallo risotto perfetto milanese or Risotto Al Funghi Porcini?
Overall, Risotto Al Funghi Porcini has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Risotto Al Funghi Porcini has fewer calories: 335 kcal versus 346 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Risotto Al Funghi Porcini has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.