Comparison
Fusilloni vs Fusilloni
Overall, Fusilloni has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fusilloni | Fusilloni |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 351 kcal | 352 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 1.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 3.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 12.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fusilloni has 19% less sugar (3 g vs 3.7 g).
- Fusilloni has 11% more protein (14 g vs 12.5 g).
Ingredients
Fusilloni
Not available.
Fusilloni
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fusilloni or Fusilloni?
Overall, Fusilloni has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fusilloni has fewer calories: 351 kcal versus 352 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fusilloni has less sugar: 3 g versus 3.7 g per 100 g.