Comparison
Fuji Apple vs Fuji apples
Overall, Fuji apples has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fuji Apple | Fuji apples |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 393 kcal | 52 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 82.1 g | 10.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fuji apples has 87% fewer calories (52 kcal vs 393 kcal).
- Fuji apples has 87% less sugar (10.4 g vs 82.1 g).
- Fuji apples has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Fuji Apple
Not available.
Fuji apples
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fuji Apple or Fuji apples?
Overall, Fuji apples has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fuji apples has fewer calories: 52 kcal versus 393 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fuji apples has less sugar: 10.4 g versus 82.1 g per 100 g.