FUET 170g vs LS saucisse droite auvergne LR 250G
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | FUET 170g | LS saucisse droite auvergne... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 428 kcal | 399 kcal |
| Fat | 38 g | 30 g |
| Saturated fat | 14 g | 13 g |
| Sugars | 2.4 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 4 g | 4.8 g |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 29 g | 31 g |
| Additives | 4 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- LS saucisse droite auvergne LR 250G has 21% less fat (30 g vs 38 g).
- LS saucisse droite auvergne LR 250G has 96% less sugar (0.1 g vs 2.4 g).
- FUET 170g has 17% less salt (4 g vs 4.8 g).
- FUET 170g has 100% more fiber (2.4 g vs 0 g).
- Only LS saucisse droite auvergne LR 250G lists: Milk.
Ingredients
FUET 170g
Viande et lard de porc (origine : Espagne), maltodextrine, sel, poivre noir, arôme naturel, antioxydants: ascorbate de sodium, lactate de potassium; ; stabilisant : sorbitol; ; conservateur: nitrate de potassium. Enveloppe : boyau naturel de porc. Traitement de surface: Penicillium spp.
LS saucisse droite auvergne LR 250G
Viande de porc (origine: France), sel, lactose (dont lait), sucre, épices, dextrose ; ; conservateurs : nitrate de potassium, nitrite de sodium. Ferments. Boyau naturel de porc. 170g de viande de porc ont été utilisés pour élaborer 100g de produit fini.
FAQ
Which is healthier: FUET 170g or LS saucisse droite auvergne LR 250G?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
LS saucisse droite auvergne LR 250G has fewer calories: 399 kcal versus 428 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
LS saucisse droite auvergne LR 250G has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 2.4 g per 100 g.