Frulos vs Proteínas Sabor Tropical
Overall, Proteínas Sabor Tropical has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Frulos | Proteínas Sabor Tropical |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 75 kcal | 50 kcal |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 12.1 g | 3.9 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | — |
| Protein | 3.4 g | 7.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Proteínas Sabor Tropical has 33% fewer calories (50 kcal vs 75 kcal).
- Proteínas Sabor Tropical has 57% less fat (0.4 g vs 0.9 g).
- Proteínas Sabor Tropical has 58% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 0.6 g).
- Proteínas Sabor Tropical has 68% less sugar (3.9 g vs 12.1 g).
- Proteínas Sabor Tropical has 52% more protein (7.1 g vs 3.4 g).
Ingredients
Frulos
Yaourt (Lait écrémé à base de poudre de lait - Lait écrémé , Crème, Poudre de lait écrémé, Ferments lactiques (lait), Sucre 8.9%, Aromes naturels, Concentré des minéraux du lait - Vitamine D
Proteínas Sabor Tropical
DESNATADO PARA BEBER SABOR TROPICAL C entes: Leche pasteurizada desnatada, agua, proteínas de la leche, entrada pasteurizada desnatada, almidón modificado, concentrado sesante (pectina) y fermentos láctico *Contiene azúcares naturalme calabaza, zanahoria y cártamo, aroma natural, edulcorante (sucralos
FAQ
Which is healthier: Frulos or Proteínas Sabor Tropical?
Overall, Proteínas Sabor Tropical has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Proteínas Sabor Tropical has fewer calories: 50 kcal versus 75 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Proteínas Sabor Tropical has less sugar: 3.9 g versus 12.1 g per 100 g.