Fruit Snacks vs Tagada pik
Overall, Fruit Snacks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fruit Snacks | Tagada pik |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 308 kcal | 366 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 44.1 g | 74 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 4.4 g | 2.8 g |
| Additives | 5 | 5 |
| Allergens | Gelatin, Orange, Peach | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fruit Snacks has 16% fewer calories (308 kcal vs 366 kcal).
- Fruit Snacks has no fat, while Tagada pik has 0.5 g.
- Fruit Snacks has 40% less sugar (44.1 g vs 74 g).
- Fruit Snacks has 37% more protein (4.4 g vs 2.8 g).
- Fruit Snacks has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Fruit Snacks lists: Gelatin, Orange, Peach.
Ingredients
Fruit Snacks
Whole fruit puree (grape, peach, orange, strawberry, raspberry), corn syrup, sugar, modified corn starch, gelatin, grape juice concentrate, citric acid, lactic acid, natural flavors, artificial flavors, ascorbic acid (vitamin C), alpha-tocopherol acetate (vitamin E), vitamin A palmitate, carnauba wax, annatto (color), turmeric (color), fruit and vegetable juice color.
Tagada pik
Sucre; sirop de glucose; gélatine; acidifiants: acide citrique, acide malique; correcteur d'acidité: malate acide de sodium; arôme; concentrés de fruits et de plantes: carthame, citron, patate douce, pomme, radis, cerise.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fruit Snacks or Tagada pik?
Overall, Fruit Snacks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fruit Snacks has fewer calories: 308 kcal versus 366 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fruit Snacks has less sugar: 44.1 g versus 74 g per 100 g.